techguerilla talk

Matt Ridings

Judgment Day: Social Media and Your Front Lines | Brass Tack Thinking

Brass Tack Thinking - Judgment Day: Social Media and Your Front Lines

Today’s post is from our friend and frequent guest contributor Matt Ridings, Founder of MSR Consulting. He’s a thought leader on integrating social media into the realm of business design and relationship marketing. He blogs over at Techguerilla, and you can find him on Twitter at @techguerilla.

Take a look at your front lines for a moment. Those initial contact points within your organization that create a first impression. An impression that will either give you an advantage, or that you must struggle to overcome.

A lot of attention is placed on customer service when this topic comes up, and rightfully so as it represents the highest volume of direct contact with your customers. But you must remember that all of your personnel once had their own ‘first contact’ with your company.

Actions Speak Loudly

When they applied for a job how were they treated by Human Resources? Did HR seem genuinely happy to be talking to them and helping them through the process? Thankful that someone would be interested enough in your company to want to work there? Or were they made to feel like a checkbox among a litany of procedures? Like they were lucky to be even considered for a job?

How you treat these future employees directly establishes the overall tone of the organization, and demonstrates the value you place on your business relationships. This is their first impression, and how they are being ‘trained’ in the ways of your organization. Why should you expect them to treat your customers any differently than you have treated them? Culture is something you demonstrate through your actions, not something you build procedures around. A fake smile can be seen quite clearly over a telephone or a tweet.

Enter social media. An environment in which the pace, and its public nature, put your people and their communication skills on display like nothing that has ever come before it. An environment that requires people to use quick judgment, something that you don’t currently give them very much opportunity to use. You put those few people whose judgment you trust at the top of escalation ladders, and rely on process to bubble the problem children (your customers) up to them eventually. Yet that type of escalation process does not, and cannot, exist in social media.

Creating Scenarios

More and more you will be dependent upon trusting your front lines to exercise sound judgment. As a result, you’ll need a different kind of approach to inducting these people into your organization, because judgment is difficult to simply teach or train. It’s typically built upon experience, and experiential skills do not come cheaply or quickly. But there are ways to create experiences that can help hone and shape judgment and critical thinking skills. ...

 

  

-->
continue reading at brasstackthinking.com

 

Posted by

Doing Good For Business' Sake

Istock_000011208422xsmall

 

Those of you who have had the questionable honor of spending a lot of one on one time with me already know my feelings on this topic.  For those of you lucky enough to have avoided such an occasion I'll try and summarize my views:
  • As transparency into companies increases, the underlying tone and culture of those companies becomes more critical to its success
  • Integrity, ethics, and social responsibility should be rewarded where in existence, strived for when needed, and demanded by management and the consumer
  • The notion that "Doing Good is Good For Business" should be a core part of the business culture
  • The consumer should accept that it is ok for a business to both do good and benefit from those actions at the same time
  • With these elements in place, a great deal more funds can be made available, particularly for smaller charitable initiatives, than currently occurs through the donation/sponsorship environment
Let's start with a few simple universal truths.
Universal truth #1: Companies are in business to make money.  
Universal truth #2: They are also filled with people who would like to make a difference.  
Universal truth #3: If you can find a way to combine the first two truths you have the opportunity to create a great deal more funds to apply towards making a difference, and the incentive for the company to do so.

All too often we as consumers criticize anything which benefits a business (or person for that matter) while in the process of being charitable.  There is this benchmark of pure altruism being applied.  And while honorable that may be, there is only so much of that that a company can do before the impact on the bottom line issues a cease and desist order.  

From my humble perspective, I would much rather see companies finding ways to leverage these efforts to sell more products or services.  The flow of funds outside the company at that point has no finite end point.

Should we really care if the Pepsi Refresh project ends up selling more soda for them?  If it does wouldn't that mean they'd be more likely to continue funding good initiatives?  Do occasions occur when a company is using a charitable initiative as a sleight of hand tool to distract you from some less than savory facts?  Of course, but is that really the norm?  

Cynicism where big enterprise is concerned has spun out of control.  Take them to task when warranted, but a company garnering benefit from a charitable activity should not be one of those times to be critical.  It is in no ones best interests, particularly those who could be helped.

Cheers,

Matt Ridings - @techguerilla
Posted by

Status Quo - A 1 Step Guide To Not Following Guides

One thing I've never understood is why many people attempt to emulate other businesses with which they want to compete.  It seems logical on the outside I suppose, "They did it this way, and they have succeeded, therefore if I do it that way I will succeed".  But there are a few problems with this logic.  First, it assumes *you* are the same as that person you're trying to emulate.  That you have the same capabilities, the same mindset, the same objectives.  Second, it's a good bet that there are a lot of other people who think that way therefore that space must be getting pretty crowded and competitive. 

Knock-off
Businesses are funny things.  To succeed you have to fill a need, you have to provide value, you have to solve a pain point....but the *way* in which you do that should not be pre-defined.  What do I mean by that?  Let's say you want to sell your product differently than the way everyone else sells it? Go for it.  Let's say you want to make it a priority for you and your workforce to be at home by 5:30pm every day? Have at it.  Let's say you're not comfortable running a business of a larger size and want to stay at the size you are?  Good for you.  These are *your* values that you're building your business around.  The business shouldn't define what your values are.  

I can hear you saying "but I *have* to so that I can compete with the guy down the street".  No. You don't.  You have a choice.  You can emulate that competitor, in which case you are roughly equivalent to that competitor, in which case you are *expected* to compete with them.  There's nothing wrong with that, as long as you are willing to let the business define you.  Or, you can define your own space.  You don't have to differentiate yourself from your competitor with unsustainable actions like better prices, or longer store hours, or better product selection, you can do it through actually being different.  You can create your own marketplace in which that competitor is no longer your competitor.  Build a business which works within your values, even if that business has never existed before.  It may just be that your values are what will differentiate you and make your competition try and emulate you instead (Zappos customer service anyone?  Googles investment in innovation culture?).

I'm not saying any of this is easy.  It's not.  And any time you break away from the pack it takes a lot more explaining to help people understand what it is you do.  You can't just say "hey, I like sleeping all day and cooking late at night so I'll open a fine dining restaurant that opens at 2am".  It still has to solve customers problems.  But what I am saying is that sometimes it's not about thinking outside the box, it's about making a new box.

Cheers,

Matt Ridings
@techguerilla
Posted by

A Measured Approach To Social Media - Sell The Burger Not The Beef

 

                I’m obviously a believer in social media and its possibilities for businesses.  However, I’m also extremely conflicted about consultants who solely focus on social media.  Many of them, who I personally know and like, are extremely talented individuals and any business should feel confident to use them.  There is also a large group of ‘others’ out there but there have been plenty of articles bashing the “snake oil salesmen” of the industry that I don’t need to rehash that discussion.  And I should clarify here, the problem I'm defining isn't that all they sell is social media solutions/consulting, it's that they don't do so in a holistic way that takes into account other aspects of the business.  

1119511_burger

 

             

 

                Businesses need to see social media plans that have taken into account their other needs, ones which have accounted for and justified against the other ways those dollars could have been used, and shown how you can cleanly integrate and compliment their other efforts. Otherwise you’re selling ground beef.  It might be awesome ground beef, but without a grill, a bun and condiments you’ll never be able to compete with my hamburger.

 

Matt Ridings - @techguerilla

 

Posted by

The Interactive Audience - Are You Ready?

736665_cemetary

The notion of differentiating a customer from a prospect is dead.

Well, not really.  The "notion" still exists.  But what used to be considered two entirely different pool segments in marketing, is now merging into the larger single pool of the "interactive audience".  The world of social media blurs these distinctions in dramatic ways.  There is a lot of information out there, including from me, about the strategy and tactics of going into that relationship model.  But I thought I'd focus briefly on some of the business operations aspects.  Moving from monologue to dialog or from direct sales/marketing to relationship sales/marketing inherently breaks a lot of the models that we've built our companies around.

Marketing Impact
Let's look at marketing for a moment.  Virtually all measurements of success today are derived from a campaign mentality.  There is a expected conversion cycle that is measured against the conversion rates at the various audience stages (prospect to customer conversion process).  And prior to the campaign there was a great deal of filtering taking place to narrow the audience pool down to those you wanted to be exposed to your marketing message.  Lastly there is a finite end point at which campaign operations cease as well as the end points for whatever call-to-action was used.  

What would that look like in a true relationship marketing mentality if executed in social media?  First and foremost, in the traditional direct marketing campaign orientation you started with a pre-selected audience.  That could have been very general (top line demographics for example) or very specific (high-end list purchase, or existing customer database).  

And while you can roughly target a few demographics within social media, there is an additional upfront stage of trust building exercises necessary if you want to optimize your ability to build and communicate with an interactive audience.  The notion of building and nurturing this interactive audience pool is really what changes everything.  Where would your campaign begin? Where would it end?  

I'm not saying that campaigns are dead, I *am* saying that campaigns in isolation are either dead or need to die.  There will have to be relationship oriented umbrella programs that span the corporate silos, and within those there will be additional programs at the silo level, and within *those* perhaps you'll still be able to run activities that look similar to campaigns of yesterday.  The funnel stages however will look very different.

Sales Impact 
Within sales, same issue.  Think about how you measure your sales reps success today.  
  • Would your commission based compensation program foster the proper mentality within your sales team if implemented in a social marketing scenario?  
  • Would it incentivize them to go through the hand holding and trust building exercises necessary?  
  • Do your divisions of "inside sales" and "outside sales" make any sense in that environment?  
  • If you create a new team and processes just for social media do you then disrupt and put into jeopardy your existing team members? 
  • If you're in B2B are you going to take on the potential channel conflict of competing with your distributor or retail channel in the same space?  
  • Are your people prepared to interact with the marketing group at a very intimate level of one to one handoffs? What about the customer service group?  

These are age-old issues in sales.  Most companies have either faced or are facing one or more of the challenges regardless of social media, but the real-time nature of the interactive audience will not let you fake your way through these problems like most companies have done for the past 15 years.  You either address them and have a plan/process or you'll fall flat on your face right in front of your audience.  You cannot save the item in your Inbox and put it off until you can walk down to the head of marketing and complain about how the prospect hadn't been properly qualified before being handed to you.  You cannot have customer service point them to a form to fill out so that you can at some point call them in the future when it's more convenient for you.  Engagement happens *now*.  Dialog happens *now*.  And to be successful in social media you have to be prepared to have it when the customer is ready to have it.

I could also write paragraphs on PR, Customer Service, etc. but you get the picture.

Know Where You're Going To Know Where To Begin 
I don't want companies to look at some of the structural and operational difficulties they might face when they go into social media on a large scale and decide that it's just too much trouble or too costly.  But what I would say is this, the above is an end-game scenario.  Treat it like one.  When you started out in business you knew you would eventually need a huge warehouse and inventory management system...but you didn't run out and spend the money on one, you had an employee walking around with a clipboard and an Excel spreadsheet.  

The above scenarios are your inventory management system, as long as you know what you're building towards you can do so in an intelligent and informed way.  I'm perfectly fine with easing your way into social media with an Excel spreadsheet, just don't paint yourself into a very difficult corner to ever get out of simply because you didn't think through the eventual implications of what would happen as it evolves.  

So when you hear those social media pundits who scream "just do it!" (the smart ones anyway) I think what you're really hearing them say is "you don't have to turn your entire company on its head to get started". I don't believe they meant "don't worry about what it means or have a plan, just dive in and hope you don't screw up".

A final note on "campaigns".  Can they still work in social media in isolation from relationship building?  The short answer, is to some degree "yes".  The longer answer, is "yes, but only if you don't want to maximize your sales over the long haul".  As my father used to say "don't cut off your nose to spite your face".

Cheers,

Matt Ridings - @techguerilla
Posted by

The Journey, Not the Destination - Social Media Flexibility

1261914_coastal_highway

Several years ago while living in San Francisco I packed up my wife, my 3 yr old son, and my dog into a large motor home and we traveled around the country for 14 months.  We only knew one thing when we left, that at some point our destination was the east coast where we planned on living.  We didn't know exactly how long before we'd arrive, we didn't know exactly which city or even which state for that matter.  Nine times out of ten we would literally wake up in the morning and only then decide where we were going next.

 
Along the way, the very best experiences we had on the trip were complete accidents.  A family who invited us into their home for dinner and took us on a tour of their buffalo ranch when the wind got so strong in Wyoming that I had to pull off the highway.  The miniature horse farm in far northern California.  Dune buggying in the massive Oregon sand dunes that we didn't even know existed.  The campground in Washington state that was empty save for us camping within feet of the most beautiful flyfishing stream you've ever seen.  And at every single stop were people interested in talking, in listening, in simply inviting you into their personal space.  They weren't in any hurry to get anywhere in particular, like us they were out to experience something along the way, whatever that may be.
 
In a way social media is very much like this.  Don't get me wrong, in business you always have a destination, but trying to draw a linear line that jumps straight from point A to point B like an airplane flight simply doesn't work. You have to accept the fact that in between those two points is a entire world of experiences that you have to go through first.  Listening, talking, discovering.  And each of those experiences may alter where you thought your destination was.  Like me you may find that you plan on going to Connecticut but you select St. Louis instead due to experiences along the way.
 
You don't have it all figured out in social media, and I'll let you in on a little secret, no one does.  Accept that now and you'll be much more able to make those divergent decisions when faced with them.  Doggedly sticking to your original objective when all signs say you should change is either very stubborn or very stupid.  The problem with taking the airplane is that you skip straight over all of those wonderful bits in the middle.  When you land you may find that what you thought was waiting for you isn't there.  Take the motorhome on the other hand, and long before you've arrived at your original destination you can discover where you may need to change your plans and adjust accordingly.
 
I want to make sure I'm very clear on one point, planning and strategy is critical to any business endeavor.  The question isn't whether you make a plan, it's whether that plan allows for flexibility and adjustment.  It's making sure that your eyes and ears are wide open.  It's making sure that when you sell a social media program to your boss that you set expectations properly.  It's making sure that the importance of relationship building is first and foremost priority.  We're all business people here.  We all know the end game is making money.  No one here, and especially not me, is saying "just dive in, some really cool serendipitous things will happen along the way and make you money somehow".  I'm assuming you're smarter than that.  I'm assuming you know I'm smarter than that.
 
Social media is driven by relationship formation.  If you want to make one relationship, then getting on that plane to fly to where that one person is will successfully allow that to happen.  If you want to make thousands of relationships, if you want to build trust, if you want to discover along the way that there may be an even better destination out there... then the journey becomes just as important, if not more so.  Those conversations with all those people in those campgrounds that you thought were meaningless at the time can richly reward you later on.  You never know when that family is going to invite you into their home for dinner, be ready for it (and bring dessert while you're at it, it's the proper thing to do).  There is a huge difference between Direct Marketing and Relationship Marketing, and it's the difference between taking the plane or the motorhome.
 
p.s. - On a side note. You would not believe what exists in this amazing country right out most of your backyards.  I'd always assumed things like "purple mountain majesties", "great plains", etc. were exaggerated words to add impact.  Not so.  They are out there.  Go find them.
 
Matt Ridings - @techguerilla
Posted by

SAMS - Social Media 3.0 - The Importance Of Advocacy

Hands

Those leading the social customer service charge look to the future to try and find meaningful ways of scaling what is currently unscalable.  Those in the branding, marketing, and PR sectors think through the most effective means of developing relationship oriented approaches.  Those in sales struggle with the notion of "sideways selling".

My belief is that at the end of all of these thought processes is a single word.  Advocacy.

To maintain any semblance of the current quality levels and ratios existing in social media customer service will require an army of advocates that become your first tier support.  Your de-facto forum leaders as it were.  On the marketing side they'll need to launch tiered recognition programs for their most valued advocates who become a portion of their marketing arm.  Sales will need long sales cycles based on establishing trust relationships, yet require a means of expanding that circle of trust as quickly as possible, customer advocates will be a primary way that occurs.

To that end I believe a new sector of tools will need to emerge for managing this base of customer advocates, Social Advocate Management Systems (SAMS) for lack of a better term.  While the word "social" is plugged into the beginning, I want to be clear that I mean the word in the relationship sense, not in the sense of "social tools" like twitter, etc.  Yes, those tools will be initial focal points, but the concept is not dependent upon them.

These advocates will come to represent far more than just a recommender of a product, more than just a "influencer", and be far more critical to a companies success.  It will be necessary to insure that you are monitoring, communicating, developing, and rewarding these advocates at a much, much deeper level.  Yet the management of an effective advocate program goes beyond existing CRM, or proposed SCRM systems that I'm currently aware of.  I do however envision the possibility of incorporating SAMS functionality into these products.  The complexity of such a system on its face may appear similar to an advanced affiliate system, but it is far more involved than that.  There are the subtleties of indirect influencer type activities for example, as well as direct hands-on quantifiable activities (customer service, sale facilitation, etc.) by the advocate.  Properly determining, predicting, and rewarding the value an advocate brings is critical but not easy to do.  In addition, you must balance the level of reward with the "type" of advocate.  If there are rewards of actual monetary value for example, detecting a true advocate vs. someone simply seeking enough volume activity to qualify for the reward might be necessary.  The latter, while perhaps influential in the short term, actually represents less value to your organization and has less incentive to provide quality interactions.

We've executed advocacy programs in traditional marketing for years, why is this so different? Because historically those programs are campaign driven exercises, there were always finite start and stop periods of internal focus on the program.  You execute, you collect your data, you analyze your data, you publish your results, and you move on to the next creative endeavor.  In the social world, it is a never ending cycle of constant development and evolution or relationships.  There is no "end".  This means we need a better lens through which to view and manage our advocates, better metrics, behavioral analysis, automated reward systems, etc. so that we can offer the highest level of value to these advocates (with the least number of people).  So yes, it's complex, but at least it's far easier to build than a "sentiment analysis" system that actually works for example.

So this is my vision of what comes after SCRM, what's yours?

Cheers,

Matt Ridings - @techguerilla
Posted by

The Social Evolution, What Is Old Is New Again

824700_evolution_

 

First, I'd like to give you some quotes to set the stage for the discussion..

 

Programs and promotions to drive traffic to Web sites are an important part of the mix, but equally important is the ability to understand the behavior of the people....

"Understanding user experience and how people interact ... is a big part of establishing a . . . relationship with customers," he said, adding that the Web lends itself to that more readily and more quickly than other targeted media such as direct mail.

"Paper doesn't go away, but [the web] gives us a new level of intimacy with consumers. With intimacy you get loyalty and with loyalty you get profitability."

A proposed model illustrates a direct relationship between .. the online customer conversion process. Relationship marketing, integrated marketing communications, and segmenting, targeting, and positioning should guide both Web ... and customer conversion. Ultimately, a [web program] should help to establish, build, and maintain long-term customer relations. 

 
  All of the above are quotes from either me directly, research synopses we did, or companies that I worked for.  And they took place anywhere from 1996-1999 in the infancy of the internet.  They could just as easily have been about marketing advice in social media today.  Now, I'll grant you that my old boss actually brought the term "Relationship Marketing" to the marketplace, so perhaps I was exposed to the philosophy earlier than most.  We just extended that vision with the Internet added as another part of the marketing mix.  But the notion of understanding and leveraging the behavior of social structures, influencers, etc. to provide value and foster a long term relationship is anything but new.  Referential marketing, Influencer Marketing, Strata Marketing, etc. are all just variations on the same theme.  So it's humorous to see a lot of social media marketing pundits describe these methods as groundbreaking tactics.  
 
I posit that the tactics and strategies aren't new, it's the ability to execute them so much easier that is groundbreaking.  What the general web did for direct marketing in the 90's, social media is now doing again.  Even deeper levels of access and intimacy are yet again made available.  However, as many of us found out the hard way back then, the more intimate the contact the harder it is to gain trust.  At the core of relationship marketing is the notion of what I will call "selling sideways".  The premise being that first you have to go through a trust building exercise (insertion into their communal circle, referenced via an influencer, etc.) before the value of what you have to say can be realized.  A head on selling proposition in an intimate environment actually creates mistrust both in what you say as well as anything you might say in the future.
 
What started this train of thought for me today was an article Eric who works for Forbes and blogs at Opinion At Large wrote titled "Why you don't need social media experts". {please note that the linked blog is Eric's personal blog, is not an official Forbes blog, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Forbes}
 
When I'm asked the question about why I feel so strongly that someone consulting in the social media world have a heavy background in marketing, my point of view is that it is this exposure to the above marketing philosophies that so closely mimic that of the social media environment that truly makes a real-world marketing background invaluable.  While not 100% of past marketers may have been involved in the above approaches, 0% of someone new to the field have been.  I say increase your odds and go for the evolved monkey over the amoeba.
 
Matt Ridings - @techguerilla
Posted by

Relationships, Cigarettes, and Answering Machines

I've been involved in technology marketing since 1994.  And yes I've read all the "bibles" out there, wrote one for that matter, and worked for some of the most innovative relationship marketers on the planet.  I've overseen sales, customer service, IT, and I've owned multiple businesses of my own.  I surround myself with people smarter than I am and I listen to them.  But the most important lesson I was ever taught in business came to me courtesy of a 65 year old, hard drinking, hard smoking guy who owned a Radio Shack franchise.  

 
I've worked as long as I can remember, I've always enjoyed business in general and hard work isn't something I was ever afraid of.  I was around 17 years old and worked evenings after school at his store, and full days on weekends.  We were paid on commission.  Luckily for me I was a computer geek even then and I could sell the shit out of the new Tandy computers (so much so that it put me into my own store a couple years later).
 
But we also sold all of that "other stuff".  That stuff that didn't make me any money like .64 cent capacitors, and spools of wire.  In those days all Radio Shacks had these little cards that you'd get punched every time you came into the store and once you'd visited a few times you got to take a free battery with you.  You'd be amazed at how successful that program was in bringing customers back into the store, and as far as I know it ran for decades.  The problem (as I naively saw it) was that it was predominantly older customers who wanted something for free, and rarely bought much of any consequence.  As a commissioned employee you tend to notice these things, especially when it is those same customers that want to talk or complain to you for hours on end.
 
The other policy was that they would repair virtually anything they had ever sold, from any store, anywhere.  This was also a supreme pain in the ass to me because it took a lot of time, it had to be packed up to be shipped off to Tandy if it couldn't be fixed in store, and I didn't get commission off of that either.   
 
One day, I get this older gentleman who walks in with a answering machine that had broken and he wants it fixed.  I start the process just like always, I get his information, I take down what the problem is, and it's only then that I notice that it's not actually an answering machine that has ever been sold at a Radio Shack.  As I attempt to explain to the gentleman that the product didn't actually come from Radio Shack he begins to get a little irate with me.  He's absolutely convinced that he bought it at our store.  I suppose he thinks that I'm just trying to get out of having to repair it, I'm not sure.  But the logic of "Sir, we sell one brand of product, that's all we've ever sold, we make our own products and don't sell anyone else's" didn't seem to be working.  It's at this point that he asks for my manager.  I gladly oblige so that I can extricate myself from the situation.
 
The owner comes out (with a cigarette hanging out of his mouth I might add), takes one look at the answering machine and asks what the problem is.  The gentleman explains his point of view, and my boss says, "you know, we don't make this unit but I think it came from {some store close by}. But don't worry about it."  And without another word my boss proceeds to walk over to our answering machines, picks one out, and hands it to the guy.  He tells him "This model is better than the one you have here that is broken, it should suit your needs just fine, take it".  The gentleman's mouth falls open a little as he was expecting to argue his way further and can't quite believe what is happening.  No cash register, no receipt, no personal info, just hands him a new answering machine and says thanks for coming in with a genuine smile on his face.
 
I'm a little pissed at this point to be honest because my boss just made me look stupid.  He didn't take my side of the argument.  The obvious, logical, perfect sense side of the argument.  So I confront him and ask "why the hell would you give a guy a $100 answering machine at no cost and then accept his broken one which wasn't even bought here? That makes no sense".  He puts on that patient face of a father teaching a life lesson and says "Son, that machine cost me $50.  If I send him up the street to return his then he'll buy something else from them.  I'll take the time to return his broken one instead and possibly get my money back.  Moreover, anytime that gentleman needs something in the future he will only go to one place to buy it.  He now knows that anything he buys from me I will back it up, no matter the problem.  That's priceless.  Now get your ass back out there and sell something"
 
There's a lot of lessons to be learned in that story.  But for me, the primary one was in learning to always view the customer as a long term relationship and protect it.  Maybe there are a few others in there that will help you along the way as well.
 
Matt Ridings - @techguerilla
 
 
Posted by

Twitter Influence - The Easy 5 Step Guide To Making Money With Twitter

Step 1: Figure out what you would do with that influence if you had it.

Step 2: Now think of some other reason because your first reason won't make you any money

Step 3: Great! Now we're talking. Wait, what? Fine, if you insist, but don't blame me when you see the size of your blogs ad check from Google.

Step 4: Be the very best at what you do, and make sure that isn't Multi Level Marketing or pitching Work At Home jobs for gods sake. 

Step 5: Perfect, you qualified your way all to the final step.  Now, since you're the best at what you do, since you can write, speak, consult, and sell at the top of your sector you are obviously already making a lot of money.  Go pay someone to figure this twitter thing out and get back out there making money.

Ok, I admit it, I'm just pissed. I decided to turn on Auto-Follow because I felt like there were some great people I was probably missing out on.  When I did so though my DM box immediately started filling with people pitching MLM and "Easy Work At Home Businesses".  So I'm unfortunately turning that back off.  If I should be following you then by all means send me a message to let me know.

Secondly, I'd be willing to wager that over time this post will see more hits than any other I have.  Which sucks, and is a little sad. But at least those people who come here looking for an easy, no hard work required, way to leverage social media will have wasted their time.  And that makes me a little happier.

Lastly, *I* have the secrets to twitter influence? Seriously?

Matt Ridings - @techguerilla

{p.s. - on a side note, I'm not slamming those people who build those *real* lists to try and help people out in social media...only the ones who target the slackers out there looking for a quick buck}
Posted by